[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libimf.so



Thanks a lot.

I am planning for the "install Intel(R) Fortran
Compiler (v 9.1.036)" route, while I am also
downloading the Intel C++ 9.1.042 compiler (to install
only if I get requests, besides ifort, when running
jobs).

If I understand correctly from: 

http://www.theochem.uwa.edu.au/fortran/intel_on_debian

the installation of the ifort compiler on debian
requires remastering a rpm package, for which
indications are provided (I never did before such a
procedure). So far I have only untarred the compiler.

Checking the Installation Guide for ifort, do the
"Requirements to develop applications for AMD Opteron"
also apply to my case of simply providing the math
library libimf.so? 

If so, I checked my amd64 system, for the requirements
by this 32bit Intel compiler:
#updatedb
$locate libm.so.6 (or libpthread.so.0, or libc.so.6)
showed all three under both
/lib/* (64bit)
and
/emul/ia32-linux/lib/* (32bit)

In contrast, both libstdc++.so.5 and lib_s.so.1 are
only present at 64bit, the former in /usr/lib/
(together with version so.5.07), and the second in
/lib/. Should the 32bit versions be provided? I never
managed 32bit libraries in my system. What is there is
from the base installation, subsequently added of X
("nv" driver, no nvidia drivers) and gnome (both
started only if needed, the system boots on $).

I wondered whether recompiling (I have the source)
with GNU compilers would be a better route, though it
is an extremy complex application, difficult to carry
out from scratch for a single case.

One further question: the package compiled with ifort
for amd64 (as indicated in my previous email
reproduced below) was installed as user in my HOME.
Should I install the Intel compiler as root or as
user?

Thanks for this further guidance and for your patience
with people like me who have only scattered knowledge
of these affairs.

cheers
francesco pietra


 




--- gnwiii@gmail.com wrote:

> On 1/13/07, Francesco Pietra <chiendarret@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > I am trying to run on debian amd64 etch, kernel
> > 2.6.18-3-amd64 #1 SMP, an application that was
> > compiled with ifort.
> >
> > It has installed correctly, I believe, though when
> > trying to start a job, error message: not found
> > libimf.so. That lib is not on either my system or
> the
> > official repositories. I see that there querries
> on
> > the web, though ones of high complexity.
> >
> > As far as I can understand this is related to the
> > Intel compilers, which I have none. I rely on
> compiler
> > from the official distribution only.
> >
> > Is any chance to come out from such a situation
> for a
> > non-expert like I am? Or would it be simpler to
> > recompile (if it it compiles with non-Intel).
> 
> Ask the developers for a statically linked version.
> 
> Switching to another compiler may be simple or
> impossible, depending
> on the application.  In general, unless you are
> willing and able to
> track down bugs, you are better off using the same
> compiler as the
> app's developers.  Intel allows individuals to use
> their compilers for
> "personal non-commercial" purposes ("Intel has
> expanded its offerings
> of free Linux* tools for non-commercial software
> development. This
> offering is provided to developers who are
> developing software on
> their own time without compensation."), while some
> large institutions
> have site licenses, so your best bet may be to
> install the Intel
> compiler.
> 
> -- 
> George N. White III <aa056@chebucto.ns.ca>
> Head of St. Margarets Bay, Nova Scotia
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
> debian-science-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 




 
____________________________________________________________________________________
The fish are biting. 
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php



Reply to: