Re: When will amd64 unstable be official?
Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Ken Bloom wrote:
>>BTW, AMD64 is very almost an official port. It is autobuilding packages
>>as they are uploaded to Debian, so any package that's not included is
>>probaby due to arch-specific reasons. All that AMD64 is waiting for to
>>become "official" is a place on the official mirrors.
>
> Uhm,.. really? Already autobuilding? Why can't one see amd64 messages in
> the REMOVALS.TXT and so?
>
> And what keeps them from moving it to the official servers?
The size of the current archive. They're restructuring which
architectures official mirrors are required to carry so that they don't
exceed the amount of disk space that most of these people have.
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.
Reply to: