[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#248043: marked as done (ftp.debian.org: Request for new architecture: amd64)

Your message dated Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:45:24 +0100
with message-id <[🔎] 1154634325.9563.7.camel@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Bug #248043: ftp.debian.org: Request for new architecture: amd64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi,

the debian amd64 port is rapidly maturing and apart from beeing so new
its reaching a point where the goals needed for it to be released
would be met (i.e. D-I support, most packages compiled, ...).

Amd64 was recently discussed on debian-devel

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/05/msg00412.html

and this is a formalization of that discussion asking for amd64 to be
added to _sid_. If there are any reasons for not adding amd64 please
do tell so we can eliminate them.

MfG
	Goswin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86-64)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-dm-opteron
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

amd64 has been in sid for quite a while now, so I think we can close
this now. :-)

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: