[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: which kernel for dual opteron ???



* Jo Shields <jo.shields@comlab.ox.ac.uk> [2006:05:31:14:12:17+0100] scribed:
<snip />

Thank you, for your participation in these matters.

> I recommend application of common sense.

Please, be patient with me.

I am trying to get my brain around this whole amd64 thing.  This is not
immediately intuitive to me, especially since everything is in motion,
and so many things are changing simultaneously.

> I've already stated why you might already have a 2.6.15 system

Yes, I understand that.  However, I used this to install:

    debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso

I am under the impression that this is integral to the recent
subsumption of amd64 into the standard debian repository; and,
therefore, that I should follow this standard repository for
etch/testing.

Today, you advised that the kernel that that ISO installed did NOT come
from the standard repository.

I am confused.  What am I missing?

> (requirement for a newer kernel for hardware reasons),

OK, I understand what you wrote there; but, how could I have guessed
that from your previous message?

So, is that the whole story; that my system requires kernel
functionality NOT available prior to 2.6.15 ???  If I know this, then
much else follows naturally ...

> that backports.org has 2.6.15 kernels on it,

Yes, you did make that clear.

Is the backports.org path preferable to debian standard `experimental'?
WHY?  Is this documented somewhere?  I have not found any FAQ regarding
this ...

Sometime in my i386 past, I ended up with a totally messed up system, by
following backports.org, and later trying to upgrade back into standard
repository, once newer packages were available there.  That, to my
simple mind, was NOT a good `application of common sense' ;<

> and that the kernel ending in -amd64-k8-smp is appropriate for you.

OK.  I was not even sure about `smp', because I have read something
stating that my system is not exactly `smp'; rather, something more
parallel than symmetric -- but, I probably misunderstood this?

> Fill in the blanks.

Thank you.  You obviously have been doing this amd64 stuff for quite
some time!  I am the newbie.  As a newbie, I try very hard to err on the
side of caution; until such time as I know enough to be dangerous.  Am I
there yet?

-- 
Best Regards,

helices
-
Dare to fix things before they break . . .
-
Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much
we think we know.  The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . .
--

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: