Re: Uml, vserver or xen for virtual servers?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 19:05:29 +0100
Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:56:07PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> > eh? util-vserver is in the amd64 archive and works just fine for
> > me.
>
> util-vserver is badly out of date (read the vserver mailing
> list archives). Don't use it. Build from source.
>
> > There aren't kernel packages, that's true, but also not that big an
> > issue, imv.
>
> There are kernel packages. See vserver mailing list archives.
>
> > It does depend on what you want to do but I've found vservers work
> > very well for what I'm doing.
>
> I agree. Xen, vserver and UML don't all compete in the same
> niche.
And what would the both of your be "doing" with your vservers?
(Just trying to educate myself a little bit more about the differences
between Xen, UML and Vserver.)
Thanks,
Jacob
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEDIVdkpJ43hY3cTURAjljAJ4rtr56PYIOhHJ7Ch86CQQZRLHC8wCgolOG
HeCzIVl5hupZ6JT57cCYvmM=
=pc5J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: