Hi Graham, El jue, 16-06-2005 a las 11:07 +0100, Graham Smith escribió: > which I thought "yeah great that looks about right, Gamin really is a > drop in replacement for fam". Just after it got the packages though apt > comes back with the stuff below (a list of about 100 packages that > depend on libfam0c102). Correctly me if I am wrong here but I thought > apt was supposed to resolve dependency issues _before_ installing and > removing packages. > > dpkg: libfam0c102: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you request: > kaboodle depends on libfam0c102. > ksnapshot depends on libfam0c102. > kmoon depends on libfam0c102. There's nothing wrong with that as far as I can tell. It just happens that it has to install libfam before installing libgamin, thus it warns you that for a moment the dependencies will be broken. > PS Is there some technical reason why none of the Debian mailing lists > don't set the Reply-To header? I think this has been quoted on this list in the past: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html . Greetings, -- Javier Kohen <jkohen@users.sourceforge.net> ICQ: blashyrkh #2361802 Jabber: jkohen@jabber.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part