Re: Trouble getting nvidia driver running
don't supposed you could cut and paste the X-Log into here so I can have
a look?
I'm currently using the same setup (just drop the -deluxe from the
motherboard, and a standard IDE disk) although I compiled my own kernel
and used the NVIDIA driver from www.nvidia.com. Every thing works here.
I am thinking it's a bad resolution/refresh rate thing but then it
doesn't make sense that the nv driver works.
Is their anything in dmesg? or syslog. Just wondering if the module is
failing to load.
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 14:49 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> I installed Debian on our new server (I wanted to see how the 64bit
> version is doing and it counts as burnin test to me), and so far
> everything pretty much just worked.
>
> System is:
> Asus A8V-Deluxe
> 2 * 512MB Kingston RAM (PC3200 CL3)
> A64 3500+ (939pin)
> PX716A ATAPI DVD writer
> 2 * WD2500JD SATA 250GB connected to the nvidia SATA ports.
> 128MB FX5200 video card
>
> Onboard Gigabit ethernet works fine using sk98lin and was autdetected by
> netinstall CD.
>
> Onboard sound is detected using alsa driver for via82cxxx (not testing
> since I have no speakers handy).
>
> DVD writer firmware updated successfully using pxupdate for x86 using
> ia32-libs and ide-scsi.
>
> I used the debian-pure64/sarge tree.
>
> Installer detected everything correctly so I didn't ahve to load any
> modules manually.
>
> I have the promise 20378 disabled in the BIOS to speed up booting.
>
> My problem is when I install the nvidia-glx driver (and hence
> nvidia-kernel-source) and compiler it, X seems to start, but simply
> turns off the monitor (bad signal sent to screen so it turns off).
> Switching to the text console works fine. I can start and stop X just
> fine, but the screen never displays. Using nv driver seems to work
> fine.
>
> I am using the 2.6.11 kernel image. Is there a patch required for using
> the nvidia driver with 2.6.11 when using the 7167 nvidia driver? I
> don't see any errors in the X log at first glance, so I am a bit puzzled
> by the video problems.
>
> Len Sorensen
>
>
Reply to: