Lack of NPTL and LD_ASSUME_KERNEL breakage

[Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>]

Greetings,

  So, pure64 doesn't have non-NPTL, fine, but can we make it so that
  setting LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=<non-NPTL kernel> doesn't break?  It's rather
  annoying...  It seems to me that glibc should probably just ignore
  LD_ASSUME_KERNEL (assuming it's only used for NPTL) when there aren't
  actually any options available besides NPTL anyway.

  	Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature