Re: powernowd / stock kernels

[Javier Kohen <jkohen@users.sourceforge.net>]

Hi guys,

is there any reason why you prefer powernowd to cpudyn? I was wondering 
because I'm using the later on my notebook. I barely use it on 
batteries, but I like the noise reduction that comes with the reduced speed.

Zachary Rizer wrote:
> Aha! You're right.
>
> Works like a charm here as well. 
>
> Thank you Thomas!
>
>
> --- "T.J. Zeeman" <tjzeeman@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 11:06 -0800, Zachary Rizer
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Please disregard previous email -- I just realized
> > > powernowd is only on XP-M processors, and that
> >
> > what
> >
> > > I'm looking for is "Cool 'n Quiet". 
> > >
> > > My mistake!
> >
> > Actually, no mistake at all. I have an AMD64 and run
> > powernowd to have
> > cpu-scaling (as provided by the CnQ-feature in the
> > cpu).
> >
> > I got it to run on a Debian kernel-image after I put
> > powernowd-k8 and
> > cpufreq-userspace in /etc/modules. It was apparently
> > necessary to have
> > these loaded forcedly to get the powernowd daemon to
> > run.
> >
> > regards,
> > Thomas


--
Javier Kohen <jkohen@users.sourceforge.net>
ICQ: blashyrkh #2361802
Jabber: jkohen@jabber.org