Re: Bug#314988: Still a problem?
hmm, looks like it is complaining about the OpenGL dev libraries- I'll install
and try again...
-Ted
On Friday 28 October 2005 12:24, Ted Kisner wrote:
> I installed the build-deps and ran dpkg-buildpackage. It died for me as
> well. The output is attached.
>
> -Ted
>
> On Friday 28 October 2005 11:44, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
> > A Divendres 28 Octubre 2005 19:10, Steve M. Robbins va escriure:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 06:16:24PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
wrote:
> > > > I have updated and upgrade today, and I have installed geomview:
> > > > ii geomview 1.8.1-9 interactive geometry viewing program
> > > >
> > > > I'm using Nvidia driver well configured and no graphics problem I
> > > > have by now.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If I open geomview, I have this messages:
> > >
> > > [ ... ]
> > >
> > > Thanks Leopold and thanks also to Larry Doolittle who sent me a
> > > similar message, privately.
> > >
> > > The messages you quote are definitely from the geomview source.
> > > However, the binary you used was built over a month ago. Would it be
> > > too much trouble for you to do the following?
> > >
> > > 1. apt-get source geomview
> > > 2. build a new deb with current libs and compiler tool chain
> > > 3. install and run new geomview
> >
> > well, I don't have much time now, but I have problem building the
> > packege: I have done 1
> > and 2 with:
> >
> > $~/linux/debian/packages-build/geomview-1.8.1$ fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage
> > -us -uc -b
> >
> > .....
> >
> > and after some messages I have this:
> >
> >
> > configure: exit 1
> > /usr/bin/make ACLOCAL="`pwd`/missing aclocal" AUTOCONF="`pwd`/missing
> > autoconf" AUTOMAKE="`pwd`/missing automake" AUTOHEADER="`pwd`/missing
> > autoheader" moduledir=/usr/lib/geomview
> > geomdatadir=/usr/share/geomview/data make[1]: Entering directory
> > `/home/leo/linux/debian/packages-build/geomview-1.8.1'
> > make[1]: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
> >
> > What I'm doing wrong?
> >
> > Leo
Reply to: