Re: xmame: why not?

To: Leonardo Boiko <leoboiko.mlbox@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: xmame: why not?
From: Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:17:54 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 43622502.6050406@stud.feec.vutbr.cz>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87acgt7ums.wl%leoboiko@gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 87acgt7ums.wl%leoboiko@gmail.com>

Leonardo Boiko wrote:

Why aren’t the xmame packages in the amd64 repositories? I grabbed the
source debs, compiled them without any trouble at all, and xmame is
working fine.

It's non-free. Seehttp://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/05/msg00403.html


Michal

Reply to:

References:
- xmame: why not?
  - From: Leonardo Boiko <leoboiko.mlbox@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: xmame: why not?
Next by Date: Re: consistent kernel oops
Previous by thread: xmame: why not?
Next by thread: udev & hotplug
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread