Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 08:13:42PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > >>Perhaps I missed something, but why is amd64 still not >>included into the "official" package pool? >> >>I am still in the NM process, but maybe I can help? > > > It's a case of one architecture too many, rather than a problem with > amd64 specifically. The archive for 12 architectures is too big. > It will be split into two parts, being one distributed by all mirrors > with the most common platforms (i386, amd64, perhaps powerpc) and a > second half containing the less used architectures. > How can I help? Is there a schedule for this? Regards Harri
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature