[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

cdrdao maintainer and status (bug 249642)



I always found it strange that cdrdao (which is required by e.g. k3b) is not 
in the official AMD64 archive. Now I found this bugreport[1], already 
attached is a fix, which has been tested by quite a few people. And still the 
maintainer Andrew Suffield refuses to accept this patch in quite a strange 
attitude.

I read a lot[2,3] of people complaining about the behaviour of asuffield, but 
did neither know nor care anything about it. But now I see it myself.
Given such circumstances (these kinds of "helpful" responses), I can 
understand that the AMD64 team was a bit unhappy with the non-official status 
of the port before testing became etch.

But what about now, to what extent is AMD64 official enough, to change this 
kind of behaviour? I guess further requests in the bug report are useless.

Thanks for your work and patience (especially Goswin),
Frank

1: http://bugs.debian.org/249642
2: http://mako.cc/copyrighteous/freesoftware/20050805-00
3: http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2005/08/msg00074.html



Reply to: