[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[PATCH] updates for amd64-archive package.



Hi Goswin,

Recent updates to libc6 package broke your amd64-archive package because
of /etc/init.d/glibc. The attached patch fixes that. It also adds some
new packages to the list which I found I needed for openoffice.

Also, I use the attached silly little script to update the archive.
Perhaps it would be appropriate for /usr/sbin?

Lastly, it would be handy if the install script would stash the public
part of the key used to sign Releases somewhere so it is easy to import
it into apt.

Thanks for the package by the way -- it is very useful!

Ian.
-- 
Ian Campbell

	"For I perceive that behind this seemingly unrelated sequence
of events, there lurks a singular, sinister attitude of mind."
	"Whose?"
	"MINE! HA-HA!"

Attachment: update-amd64-archive
Description: application/shellscript

diff -urN amd64-archive-0.2.orig/packages.list amd64-archive-0.2/packages.list
--- amd64-archive-0.2.orig/packages.list	2005-07-15 18:23:23.000000000 +0100
+++ amd64-archive-0.2/packages.list	2005-08-30 06:51:54.000000000 +0100
@@ -6,8 +6,11 @@
 libsdl1.2debian
 zlib1g
 libsdl1.2debian-oss
+libdb4.2
+libwpd8
 libx11-6
 libxext6
+libxinerama1
 openoffice.org-bin
 libart-2.0-2
 libaudio2
diff -urN amd64-archive-0.2.orig/special/libc6 amd64-archive-0.2/special/libc6
--- amd64-archive-0.2.orig/special/libc6	2005-07-14 07:57:43.000000000 +0100
+++ amd64-archive-0.2/special/libc6	2005-08-30 06:49:25.000000000 +0100
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 # remove binaries
 rm -rf sbin usr/bin usr/sbin
 
+rm -f etc/init.d/glibc.sh
 rm -f lib/i486-linux/ld-linux.so.2
 ln -s i486-linux/ld-2.3.2.so lib/ld-linux.so.2
 ln -s /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 lib/i486-linux/
@@ -17,6 +18,8 @@
 # Add Conflicts on ia32-libs
 sed -i -e "s/^Replaces: /Replaces: ia32-libs, /" DEBIAN/control
 
+rm DEBIAN/conffiles
+
 # Install scripts
 cat >> DEBIAN/postinst <<EOF
 LIBDIR=lib/i486-linux

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: