[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: AMD 64 Stability on Asus A8v Deluxe



Hi,

Why dont you simply use memtest86?
I have the same configuration the test worked fine for a whole night.
The only thing I had to change to have my memory recognize properly was the speed (from auto to
200MHz for DDR 400)


 
--- "Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Le 20.07.2005 21:32:17, Matthias Wenthe a écrit :
> > Jean-Luc Coulon wrote:
> > 
> >        1) kernel compilation test with the following script:
> > 
> > #!/bin/tcsh
> > # ramtest
> > #
> >   make ARCH=i386 bzImage
> >    foreach i (0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9)
> >      foreach j (0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9)
> >       foreach k (0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9)
> >        ( make clean;make ARCH=i386 bzImage  > log."$i"$j$k ) >&
> > log.err."$i"$j$k
> >      end
> >    end
> >  end
> > 
> > 
> >        I must end up with 1000 identical Logfiles
> > 
> >> Which RAM parameters do you use?
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> With the same board and Corsair RAM (given for 2-3-3-6 for P4 and   
> >> 2.5-3-3-6 for athlon64), I was working in 32bit with 2 instead of  
> >> 2.5  for the CAS, but I had to set it to 2.5 in 64 bit.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Maybe you have to relax a bit your timings?
> > 
> > I followed your advice and checked the memory timings in BIOS, I found
> > a puzzling variaty of parameters, almost all of the were set on AUTO
> > 
> > Here is a summary of the main possible switches:
> > 
> > parameter		possible Values		help
> > 
> > Burst Length: 		8/4 Beats		64-Bit Dq must  
> > use the 4 beats
> > 
> > CAS			2/2.5/3 CLK
> > TRC			7-13 CLK
> > TRFC			9-15 CLK
> > TRCD			2-6  CLK
> > TWR			2-3  CLK
> > TRWT			1-6  CLK
> > TRAS			5-15 CLK
> > TRP			2-6  CLK
> > TWLC			1-2  CLK
> > ASYNC LAT		4-9  CLK
> 
> I've corsair DDR in dual channel
> I've left the burst to its highest value
> 
> I use 2.5-3-3-6-1T
> 
> 2.5 is CAS
> 3 is tRCD
> 3 is tRP
> 6 is tRAS
> 1T command rate (Disabled for 1T, Enabled for 2T)
> 
> I've left the other "as is"
> 
> The processor is an athlon 3500+
> It runs at nominal voltage/frequency. But I've not left on 'auto' the  
> parameters because this card has a nasty auto-overclocking feature.
> 
> I've set manually to the nominal values :
> I use a FSB of 200, multiplier 11  (If we can speak of FSB with this  
> architecture).
> 
> I've cool and quient enabled
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > I changed Burst Length to 4 Beats (what t.h. is 64-Bit dq?)
> > and CAS to 3, left the rest on AUTO but still got the kernel panics  
> > with 64 Bit Kernels.
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> 
> > Jean-Luc, you said you have the same mainboard. What other hardware
> > do you use? Maybe I can change the grafic card or give up the  
> > software raid to get a stable 64 bit system.
> > I would like to encourage other members of this list with an Asus A8V  
> > motherboard to report about there configuration so that I finally can
> > find a way to tell if I have a defect mainboard or an exotic hardware
> > composition problem.
> 
> I've :
> 2 SATA Maxtor disks on the VIA chipset, software RAID1
> 1 IDE DVD burner Pioneer 108
> 1 Asus Radeon A9250/TD (AGP)
> 
> I don't use the Promise chipset
> 
> I've used a Radeon 9500 also but not in 64 bit. I've given it to my  
> daughters who *need* graphic power for the games...
> 
> The BIOS is 1013
> 
> Remark : I have had problems with the graphic mode and some machine  
> check, even in 32 bit with the previous BIOS. 1009 was "just" working,  
> it was imposible to have a graphical session with 1011 and 1012, there  
> is a fix about AGP in 1013.
> 
> > 
> > Best Regars
> > 
> > Matthias Wenthe
> > 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Jean-Luc
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFC3rGuXit3lz9m7V4RApV0AJ9B6+Po9fHyCxaSZoyeQQrLasBflwCfWhP0
> 3KqdFGHwXW5EHeA5F1YDUsA=
> =CXqy
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 



Reply to: