Le 25.06.2005 18:50:26, Jacob Larsen a écrit :
Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: > I've seen in the "release notes" that there is a problem with gnupg. > Are there any plan to do the port of gnupg or is there any alternative? What problems specifically? I don't use it that much, but it looks like it works for mail signing (otherwise please tell me).
Just because I've read: http://amd64.debian.net/docs/package_changes.txt And seen: ### AMD64 - Package differences to Debian### Compared to Debian i386, not counting binNMUs on i386 where all other arches are
### the same as AMD64. 1. Patched (binNMU) packages. ----------------------------- Package Our Version Reason syslinux 2.11-0.1.0.1.pure64 #249506, #298940 linux86 0.16.14-1.2.0.1.pure64 #260647 gnupg 1.4.1-1.0.1 Was built in a wrong way. [ ... ]And I can see gnupg in this diff list of the packages in Debian i386 and AMD64.
/Jacob
Jean-Luc
Attachment:
pgpwm8FilOqSo.pgp
Description: PGP signature