Re: Acrobat Reader
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 08:10:44PM -0500, Javier Kohen wrote:
> El vie, 25-03-2005 a las 16:33 -0800, Ryan Lovett escribió:
> > I'm also unable to start 7.x with all the /emul/ libs in place.
>
> This is just a wild guess, but maybe some libraries are missing which
> the Reader attempts to load dynamically, then fails and finally aborts?
> Maybe "strace -e open -f <your command line>" can shed some light.
>
> After all, Ric Otte reports that he's able to run it in a 32-bit chroot.
Its looks like all the libraries are there. Something is explicitly
killing it:
...
open("/usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules.cache", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules", O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat64(0x3, 0xffffd364) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, 0x3 /* MAP_??? */, 34, 0xffffffff) = 0x55ee3000
read(3, "# GNU libc iconv configuration.\n"..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, ".B1.002//\nalias\tJS//\t\t\tJUS_I.B1."..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, "859-3\t1\nmodule\tINTERNAL\t\tISO-885"..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, "9-14//\nalias\tLATIN8//\t\tISO-8859-"..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, "CSEBCDICES//\t\tEBCDIC-ES//\nalias\t"..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, "IBM284//\nalias\tEBCDIC-CP-ES//\t\tI"..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, "ias\t864//\t\t\tIBM864//\nalias\tCSIBM"..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, "\tIBM937\t\t1\nmodule\tINTERNAL\t\tIBM9"..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, "UC-JP//\nmodule\tEUC-JP//\t\tINTERNA"..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, "143IECP271//\tIEC_P27-1//\nalias\tI"..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, "\nmodule\tINTERNAL\t\tISO_10367-BOX/"..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, "\t\tto\t\t\tmodule\t\tcost\nmodule\tShift"..., 4096) = 222
read(3, "", 4096) = 0
close(3) = 0
munmap(0x55ee3000, 4096) = 0
futex(0x565cc1f0, FUTEX_WAKE, 2147483647) = 0
open("/usr/lib/gconv/UTF-16.so", O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, "\177ELF\2\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0>\0\1\0\0\0\300\t\0"..., 512) = 512
close(3) = 0
futex(0x55ed3c84, FUTEX_WAKE, 2147483647) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, [], NULL, 0) = 0
tgkill(23368, 23368, SIGABRT) = 0
--- SIGABRT (Aborted) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGABRT +++
Ryan
Reply to: