[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Fwd: Re: snmpd network intefaces not displayed]



It was dying just before the UDP-MIB: line, although I tried this
morning just to confirm and it seems to be working now, last Friday I
did a dist-upgrade on it for other reasons and I remember an snmp
package at least I think I remember seeing one.

MRTG is now showing results.

`dpkg -l snmpd`

Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err:
uppercase=bad)
||/ Name           Version        Description
+++-==============-==============-============================================
ii  snmpd          5.1.2-6        NET SNMP (Simple Network Management
Protocol


On Sat, 2005-08-01 at 03:01 +0100, Martin Kos wrote:
> hi jacob
> 
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Jacob wrote:
> 
> > I'm seeing something simalar on both the pure64 debian and the gcc3.4
> > lines. snmp sems to stop responding as soon as snmpwalk tries to read
> > the interface information, it just hangs, no core dump and the process
> > is still running and I think the udp port is still open but a second
> > snmpwalk after I ctrl^c the first doesn't even get a response from the
> > server.
> where do you see that the snmp daemon hangs? output of snmpwalk:
> 
> snmpwalk -v 2c -c public localhost
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysDescr.0 = STRING: Linux pluto 2.6.9 #1 Mon Nov 15 
> 18:13:39 CET 2004 x86_64
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysObjectID.0 = OID: 
> NET-SNMP-MIB::netSnmpAgentOIDs.10
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysUpTime.0 = Timeticks: (1586) 0:00:15.86
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysContact.0 = STRING: snmpd-admin@kos.lugs.ch
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysName.0 = STRING: pluto
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysLocation.0 = STRING: RZ6
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORLastChange.0 = Timeticks: (0) 0:00:00.00
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID.1 = OID: IF-MIB::ifMIB
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID.2 = OID: SNMPv2-MIB::snmpMIB
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID.3 = OID: TCP-MIB::tcpMIB
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID.4 = OID: IP-MIB::ip
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID.5 = OID: UDP-MIB::udpMIB
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID.6 = OID: 
> SNMP-VIEW-BASED-ACM-MIB::vacmBasicGroup
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID.7 = OID: 
> SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB::snmpFrameworkMIBCompliance
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID.8 = OID: SNMP-MPD-MIB::snmpMPDCompliance
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID.9 = OID: 
> SNMP-USER-BASED-SM-MIB::usmMIBCompliance
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORDescr.1 = STRING: The MIB module to describe 
> generic objects for network interface sub-layers
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORDescr.2 = STRING: The MIB module for SNMPv2 
> entities
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORDescr.3 = STRING: The MIB module for managing 
> TCP implementations
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORDescr.4 = STRING: The MIB module for managing IP 
> and ICMP implementations
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORDescr.5 = STRING: The MIB module for managing 
> UDP implementations
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORDescr.6 = STRING: View-based Access Control 
> Model for SNMP.
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORDescr.7 = STRING: The SNMP Management 
> Architecture MIB.
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORDescr.8 = STRING: The MIB for Message Processing 
> and Dispatching.
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORDescr.9 = STRING: The management information 
> definitions for the SNMP User-based Security Model.
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORUpTime.1 = Timeticks: (0) 0:00:00.00
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORUpTime.2 = Timeticks: (0) 0:00:00.00
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORUpTime.3 = Timeticks: (0) 0:00:00.00
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORUpTime.4 = Timeticks: (0) 0:00:00.00
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORUpTime.5 = Timeticks: (0) 0:00:00.00
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORUpTime.6 = Timeticks: (0) 0:00:00.00
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORUpTime.7 = Timeticks: (0) 0:00:00.00
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORUpTime.8 = Timeticks: (0) 0:00:00.00
> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORUpTime.9 = Timeticks: (0) 0:00:00.00
> UDP-MIB::udpTable = No more variables left in this MIB View (It 
> is past the end of the MIB tree)
> 
> 
> i have build the experimental version of snmp (5.2) from
> http://packages.debian.org/experimental/source/net-snmp
> but it's still the same :-(
> 
> does nobody on this list use the snmpd ? would be great to here 
> if somebody can get network statistics on his machine.
> 
> regards
>   KoS



Reply to: