Re: gcc 3.4: old xine-ui packages are lost?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jochens wrote:
| On 05-Jan-07 23:17, Harald Dunkel wrote:
|
|>Why was the xine-ui rebuilt with gcc 4.0? Any problems?
|>The changelog doesn't indicate anything.
|
|
| The gcc-3.4 archive is currently being converted into a gcc-4.0 archive.
AFAIR the plan was to keep gcc 3.4.x at least till Sarge is
released. After release date the changes done for gcc-3.4
were supposed to be integrated into the Unstable tree.
| Since a few weeks, every new package version has been built with gcc-4.0.
| There were a few problems at the beginning and for some packages I had
| to switch back to gcc-3.4, but generally it worked quite well. In my
| own archive I have successfully built 95% of all source packages with
| gcc-4.0.
|
If you have obvious compilation failures for 5% of all packages
when using gcc 4.0, how many packages do you expect to have
additional internal problems that haven't been detected yet?
I would like to keep amd64 (gcc-3.4). gcc 4.0 is _too_ experimental.
Regards
Harri
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFB4AUCUTlbRTxpHjcRAu12AJ96AzKWaxZe6xtoTmxSxuJ/YFq5pwCfTKBZ
rTLG0r41X+yRb/oYvqVGKCY=
=07Kr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: