Re: Bug#277972: glibc: Please change the remaining instances of 'lib64' to 'lib' on amd64
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 08:18:40AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> On 04-Oct-24 23:24, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:18:15PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > >
> > > This patch is harmless with respect to any LSB requirement.
> > > The name of the dynamic loader, which is coded into every binary
> > > can only be changed in the gcc package. This patch does not change
> > > that.
> >
> > I don't know what you all changed in the gcc-3.4 archive. But
> > this is what I now get with something I just compiled:
> >
> > ldd test
> > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x0000002a9566d000)
> > /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000002a95556000)
> >
> > While with the pure64 archive with either gcc-3.3 of 3.4 it's
> > still pointing to /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
>
> I patched the gcc-3.4 package in the amd64/gcc-3.4 archive to get that
> result. For the patch I used please look at BTS #277852. I recompiled
> the complete amd64/gcc-3.4 archive with that patch and without the
> '/lib64' and '/usr/lib64' symlinks in place. I still have to reupload
> most of the recompiled packages to alioth but you should be able to
> debootstrap a new chroot from the amd64/gcc-3.4 archive and do a
> 'rm /lib64' without making the system unusable.
Does your binaries run on other x86-64 distributions without any compat
symlinks ? I think this is an absolute requirement for pure64.
Cheers,
Bill.
Reply to: