Re: Compiler opt

To: debian-amd64 <debian-amd64@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Compiler opt
From: Jérôme Warnier <jwarnier@beeznest.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 01:48:12 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 1093823292.9691.1.camel@aphrodite.beeznest.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1093728736.15893.45.camel@localhost>
References: <[🔎] 1093652533.724.16.camel@cathcart.sysc.pdx.edu> <[🔎] 1093687894.2455.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] 1093719304.15893.21.camel@localhost> <[🔎] 200408282025.44586.paul@codesourcery.com> <[🔎] 1093728736.15893.45.camel@localhost>

[..]
> Is it correct that both em64t and amd64 have sse2?  (Don't quiz me on
> what exactly that is yet... I'm a beginner in that area.  I'll find it
> on my own...  unless yous can recommend a good book on the subject?)
Yes, they both have. Or AMD is advertising it and lying. ;-)

> > If you're asking for binaries for a particular CPU, this something entirely 
> > different, and is not specific to AMD64. The same applies to i386 vs i686 vs 
> > k7, armv4 vs armv5 vs xscale, and probably most other architectures.
> 
> Do you know if there are plans to, or any real reason to, create a
> libc6-amd64 package?
Aren't you just looking for amd64-libs?

[..]

-- 
Jérôme Warnier
Consultant
BeezNest
http://beeznest.net

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Compiler opt
  - From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>

References:
- Compiler opt
  - From: Karl Hegbloom <hegbloom@pdx.edu>
- Re: Compiler opt
  - From: Sebastian Steinlechner <amd64@resourcecode.de>
- Re: Compiler opt
  - From: Karl Hegbloom <hegbloom@pdx.edu>
- Re: Compiler opt
  - From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
- Re: Compiler opt
  - From: Karl Hegbloom <hegbloom@pdx.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Compiler opt
Next by Date: gcc vs. g++: really strange behaviour
Previous by thread: Re: Compiler opt
Next by thread: Re: Compiler opt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread