On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 18:16, Frederik Schueler wrote: > On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 10:35:04PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > The 2.4 kernel doesn't have support for devfs on amd64. > > It looks like it's corrupting memory and therefor disabled. > > Because we don't have devfs support we can't mount the initrd. > > Furthermore DI needs devfs in a couple of places, it was designed > around it. The partitioner for example uses it to find the disks. > Without devfs, DI simply is non-functional. I gather it should be portable to a udev-based devfs-alike namespace? -s
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part