Re: libGL compiled without -fPIC?

[Kurt Roeckx <Q@ping.be>]

On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 08:00:42PM -0600, Mark Nipper wrote:
> 	Anyway, I found the problem.  In /usr/lib I had:
> ---
> lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root   12 Dec 23 21:47 libGL.so -> libGL.so.1.2
> lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root   17 Dec 14 16:21 libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.1.0.6629
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root 586K Dec  7 21:14 libGL.so.1.0.6629
> 
[...]
> 	If you could confirm (assuming you don't have the binary
> nVidia drivers installed) the sanity of this situation pre
> nvidia-glx, I'll file a bug report as I recall the same thing on
> x86 too.  Interestingly enough, if I do 'dpkg -S
> /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2' it gives me:


I have:
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 20 Dec 18 12:17 /usr/lib/libGL.a -> ../X11R6/lib/libGL.a
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 12 Dec 18 12:17 /usr/lib/libGL.so -> libGL.so.1.2
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 12 Dec 18 12:17 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.1.2
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 25 Dec 18 12:17 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 -> ../X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2

dpkg --search /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2
xlibmesa-gl: /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2

dpkg --search /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2
xlibmesa-gl: /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2

I do not have anything from nvidia installed.


Kurt