* Santiago Vila (sanvila@unex.es) wrote: > The symlinks could be in libc6, which is only essential de facto. > > But even if the symlinks are in base-files, it would be odd and ugly > that base-files contains /usr/X11R6/lib64 when it does not even > contain /usr/X11R6/lib in other architectures. Hmm, I can understand this, and agree with it. > Would not be enough to have /lib64 and /usr/lib64 in base-files > and /usr/X11R6/lib64 in, say, xfree86-common? > > Remember that libx11-6 depends on xfree86-common, so the symlink would > be present as soon as you have a single package installe which is > linked against the X libraries. This would certainly be reasonable, imv. I don't have any problem w/ this compramise. Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature