* Stephen Frost (sfrost@snowman.net) wrote: > There is concern from dpkg upstream (as mentioned in the email below) > that we're not decided upon what the Opteron support in dpkg should > look like. This is a call for patches to add Opteron support to dpkg > which we will then attempt to come to consensus on as the 'porters' to > the architecture. Once a consensus on a patch is made we will > forward it to dpkg upstream for inclusion. Personally, my preference is to go with whatever produces: dpkg --print-architecture = amd64 dpkg --print-gnu-architecture = x86-64 (or x86_64, whichever is right) Basically, from Debian's point of view it's amd64 (lists, ports page, cvs, etc). Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature