[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dpkg and debhelper patches for lib64 support



* Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> [030617 19:30]:
> Package: libfoo1
> Package64: lib64foo1
> Provides: libfoo1-$(architecture)
> Architecture: any
> Description: the foo library
>  The foo library for all your bar needs.
> Description64: the 64 bit foo library
>  The foo library for all your 64 bit bar needs.
> 
> Package: libfoo-dev
> Package64: lib64foo-dev
> Architecture: any
> Depends: libfoo1-$(architecture)
> Conflicts: libfoo-dev
> Description: the foo library development files
>  Development files for the foo library.
> Description64: the 64 bit foo library development files
>  Development files for the 64 bit foo library.

I have been following the thread and like what I see.

I have a small issue that I am not sure how to address.

On a 64 bit kernel with 32 bit binary emulation support, you can run
aything.  However, when using a 32 bit kernel, one must have at least a
32 bit modutils.  Running a 64 bit insmod, which I had the displeasure
of doing once, is disastrous on a 32 bit kernel.

There may be other instances where a package (ex: the i386 kernel) would
require another to provide a particular binary variant (ex: the i386
modutils).

Granted this is a small problem.

Bart.

-- 
				WebSig: http://www.jukie.net/~bart/sig/

Attachment: pgpWtxmUVVqYO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: