Re: dpkg and debhelper patches for lib64 support
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Gerhard Tonn wrote:
> > Package: aalib1
> > +Package64: lib64aalib1
> > Architecture: any
> > Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
> > Description: ascii art library
> >
> > I would rather maintain a separate copy of this stanza for the 64 bit
> > package. This would also let me give it a useful description.
> >
>
> Again, I think, this creates a lot of redundancy, since 99 per cent of the
> information of both packages are identical. If we add another copy for the 64
> bit package, it is open how to name the Architecture for the 64 bit as well
> as for the 32 bit variant.
Package: libfoo1
Description: ${description}
This package contains the 32 bit version of the foo library.
Package: lib64foo1
Description: ${description}
This package contains the 64 bit version of the foo library.
Reply to: