[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: alpha and hppa removal from unstable/experimental



On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Mark Hymers <mhy@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As mentioned in the recent ftp-team meeting minutes, we're planning to
> remove alpha and hppa from unstable.  They were removed from testing
> before the squeeze release and there's no sign that they will be release
> architectures for wheezy.  As such, we're planning to remove them from
> unstable and experimental in the next few days.  buildd support for
> unstable and experimental will also be ended at that time, but will
> obviously continue for lenny updates / security builds.
>
> Before we remove the architectures, archives will be taken for anyone
> who wants to take a copy of the dump to use elsewhere.  These dumps will
> be made available on request.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
>
> --
> Mark Hymers <mhy at debian dot org>
>
> <h0lger> Ganneff: I'm confident in your ability to create a flamewar.
>     Extremedura QA/i18n meeting 2008
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNljvVAAoJEBG05f8VsP2CGKQP/1uNWPmrByhuR0QttS053LFV
> EFS1pmo9uxjUSKrhjHVBVViJGWQkLXJ+33wQ70FKa7ZAFFwZSkx34nk7bHYDipMH
> cpKHiTQ0uf8MD0LNpsbgq8qhZGku17MZIa481p22ahuTIgBAt0d08gxCWh1DG+Dt
> fIn+9ePwyFSCJuvcGk4gwwUL5Gx/PkKsGSVMxrSPhObAKq7iPcCVfXdjQF74eBfR
> mMVw2koqsLOpYG7OTyY9JFDF1+vhyx9LqcPrikoMFgJptwWRNzCQzT0Lhk7Vxtav
> LGXZxlAUuqaUk7D8gm4zVJgnkXCynRVoU/du3Mu3zAIzcFtEVDnO56DEwc2emxI4
> 7kY80PzPUXoXTlb98kVpIG6LEuo1jkvRk20M+8aBgsc6nJNVVIbKqeSMyi295Q4a
> AWkE15+Dok/PwYzLuPuBxusOKe2CBZg7y8w+Rc8a4WzDCi9jZyLx5WiqcGZ9yxD8
> jJLyGKYo8q9X3yY5CwBIshb6x5IL/cT7QLOr/AlqTK96+i2c2qaSBgJyzF2ULAW6
> pu4qGVgyItfGiB0HQTjMOYWNBAbV54LNzfJuDoiJd7IdE5Wpyf8/LINey7eLhUst
> oe/zsaRk2AjjgT2pm5OngSSLXcHaeBDIlXo6WaUkXB3Rol+yqlb3W1CJa9UkeOVH
> xu2VbT9h4KzTusvv6RHF
> =Bd7T
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Might want to hold off on that for alpha. There's been a flurry of
emails in the last week working to revive it.

Matt


Reply to: