Re: recent udev upgrade failure on alpha
On 24/02/11 20:02, Bob Tracy wrote:
Well... Yes, "sid" is cantankerous and known to occasionally break
working systems, but this is the first time the thermonuclear software
upgrade option has been used effectively on my poor Alpha :-(.
Specifically, I've got about 50 installed but unconfigured packages and
an almost unbootable (single-user mode only) machine because udev 166-1
absolutely requires inotify support,
Oops, sorry, I should've sent a message to the list to warn people of this!
As you have identified the problem is that the syscall inotify_init1()
is not implemented in the Debian supplied kernel. It did not make it
into the kernel until version 2.6.33. I did submit a bug report and a
patch to update the kernel to the Debian bugzilla but I was too late and
the Squeeze freeze beat me to it and it didn't get included.
So unless you are prepared to:
1) Download a new kernel and compile and install it yourself,
2) run "make headers_install" in the kernel and copy the file
usr/include/asm/unistd.h header from the kernel sources to the system
/usr/include/asm/unistd.h,
3) and rebuild libc6.1 from source (which is a time consuming build) and
install it
don't upgrade to Sid!!! I think a new kernel may have appeared in Sid
in the last day or two so the first two steps above may no longer be
needed, but the third step is needed until a new libc6.1 package comes
through.
And if you have upgraded to Sid in the last week (or so) and hit the
unconfigured udev problem don't switch off or reboot your machine until
you have done all the above steps else you may find your Alpha unbootable.
And the other problem I have hit is that the upgraded apt and apt-utils
packages are broken and it leaves one unable to upgrade their system! So
make sure you have copies of the deb files for apt and apt-utils for the
latest version that made it into Squeeze on hand. I think I have placed
a hold on apt and apt-utils at version 0.8.10.3. I hadn't made a bug
report at the time I encountered this problem as there were other bug
reports already made that looked a little similar. But the apt that I
got a couple of days ago was still borked.
Cheers
Michael.
Reply to: