[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: problem compiling kernel ld error relocation truncated to fit: GPREL16 against symbol



On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:54 PM, carl hansen <carlhansen1234@gmail.com> wrote:
> Problem compiling kernel 3.1, gcc 4.6.1 or .2, latest binutils
>
> I think it's ld error
> google suggested -Wl,--no-relax, didn't make a difference, unless I
> did  it wrong
>
>
>  ld  -static -N  --build-id -o .tmp_vmlinux1 -T
> arch/alpha/kernel/vmlinux.lds arch/alpha/kernel/head.o
> init/built-in.o --start-group  usr/built-in.o
> arch/alpha/kernel/built-in.o  arch/alpha/mm/built-in.o
> arch/alpha/math-emu/built-in.o  kernel/built-in.o  mm/built-in.o
> fs/built-in.o  ipc/built-in.o  security/built-in.o  crypto/built-in.o
> block/built-in.o  lib/lib.a  arch/alpha/lib/lib.a  lib/built-in.o
> arch/alpha/lib/built-in.o  drivers/built-in.o  sound/built-in.o
> firmware/built-in.o  net/built-in.o --end-group
> init/built-in.o: In function `do_one_initcall':
> /var/src.build/kernelbuild/latest/linux-3.1/init/main.c:682:(.text+0x8):
> relocation truncated to fit: GPREL16 against symbol `initcall_debug'
> defined in .sbss section in init/built-in.o
> /var/src.build/kernelbuild/latest/linux-3.1/init/main.c:689:(.text+0xf8):
> relocation truncated to fit: GPREL16 against symbol `initcall_debug'
> defined in .sbss section in init/built-in.o
> init/built-in.o: In function `set_reset_devices':
> /var/src.build/kernelbuild/latest/linux-3.1/init/main.c:146:(.init.text+0x10):
> relocation truncated to fit: GPREL16 against symbol `reset_devices'
> defined in .sbss section in init/built-in.o
> init/built-in.o: In function `init_setup':
> /var/src.build/kernelbuild/latest/linux-3.1/init/main.c:293:(.init.text+0x5c):
> relocation truncated to fit: GPREL16 against `.sbss'

Yes, I hit this just two days ago. Using LDFLAGS="--relax" allows the
compilation to finish, but it produced a kernel that panicked on boot.

Not sure if it's related to binutils bug
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5276 or if its a
gcc bug. Compiling with the same binutils and gcc-4.5.3 produced a
working kernel though.

Matt


Reply to: