Re: monotone: FTBFS on alpha, configure fails mysteriously
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:38:21AM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> If you look carefully at the buildd log for this one, you see it went
> off the rails a long time before that...
> checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... no
> checking whether g++ accepts -g... no
> checking dependency style of g++... none
> checking for C++ compiler warning flags... unknown
> ^^ this looks like a completely nonfunctional C++ compiler. Actually,
> there are problems even earlier:
> The following extra packages will be installed:
> cpp-2.95 g++-2.95 gcc-2.95 libboost-filesystem1.34.0 libboost-regex1.34.0
> libc6.1-dev libicu36 libicu36-dev libstdc++2.10-dev libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2
> linux-libc-dev zlib1g-dev
> ^^ g++ *2.95*?! What on earth is it doing using that dinosaur?
> Upstream doesn't support anything before 3.3, and would like to bump
> that to 3.4.
> I need advice from the alpha porters on what might be wrong here and
> how to proceed. debian-alpha cc:ed.
The most recent upload of glibc to unstable has introduced a libc-dev
dependency which is in conflict with the sbuild configuration on multiple
buildds. As a result, libstdc++-dev has gone missing from these chroots,
and the buildd admin will need to make some changes to restore
build-essential in these environments.
Closing the bug report since this is not a bug in monotone.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.