[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: xorg 7.0 and Radeon 7500



Mike Campbell wrote:
> I've removed my previously working radeon 9100 and put the old elsa gloria back in for now because of hard lockups with or without dri.  
> At first, only dri was causing lockups, but now xorg 7 locks up with or without dri.
> 
> Hopefully this will be resolved soon; i'm starting to get worried about the state of Alpha ports: how long will we have a broken libc?, freebsd dropping alpha in 7.x, a lot less traffic on this list than there used to be... among other issues.

I share all of these concerns.  I'm beginning to wonder just how many of
us are left...  I've been posting here on the assumption the problems
I'm seeing are Alpha-specific.  There's an implicit assumption that the
developers who maintain Alpha ports for Debian are at least lurking in
the background.  As far as helping ourselves, I suspect the odds would
improve with judicious crossposting, but *where*?  The libc and Xorg
lists are high-traffic, and at least in the case of libc, the Alpha-
specific problems with LinuxThreads are known and not going to be fixed
(per Ulrich Drepper -- gotta wonder if the problems would be allowed to
persist if they affected x86).

Tried moving my monitor from the VGA port to the DVI port using the
DVI <--> VGA adapter this evening.  No change as far as fbdev behavior.
I'll try the radeon driver with dri disabled sometime tomorrow.  Sorry
I don't have the time to try multiple things at a single sitting, but
the weekend should work out a bit better in that respect.

Last resort will be to scrub Xorg 7.X off the system and go back to
what I had before I got on this crazy roller-coaster.  That's *not* the
preferred option, because no progress will be made in fixing the problems.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Tracy                   WTO + WIPO = DMCA? http://www.anti-dmca.org
rct@frus.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Reply to: