On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 11:03:04PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> [2004-08-03 13:35]: > > Trying to build plplot on alpha here fails with the following error: > > > > dh_movefiles -a --no-package=libplplot9 --no-package=libplplot-dev \ > > --no-package=plplot-bin > > dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/share/octave/site/m/PLplot not found (supposed to put it in octave-plplot) > > dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/octave not found (supposed to put it in octave-plplot) > > make: *** [install-stamp] Error 1 > > > > Any idea where this file that it's looking for might have gone? :) > This looks like an old bug that I thought had been fixed. The source of the > problem used to come earlier in the build process, during configure. Could > you please send the build log to me? > Otherwise, can I have access to an alpha machine with the build-deps > installed? > > And yes, the alpha buildd problem is a known issue. lully.d.o is down, > > and escher isn't powerful enough to keep up with the present-day upload > > rate. > Oh, it is too bad, in particular because we have a release scheduled in the > near future. Will alpha be a supported architecture in sarge? Okay, I've found time to take a closer look at this problem, and you're right that it's related to configure. Specifically, it's related to a buggy and unusable octave: $ octave --version Illegal instruction $ octave -q -f <<EOF > printf(octave_config_info("localfcnfilepath")); > EOF Illegal instruction $ This results in files being installed to /usr instead of to /usr/share/octave/site/m/. Could this be related to an out-of-date lapack3 on alpha? Regards, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature