[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: compiling 2.4.20



after running apt-get update:

the package is called kernel-tree-2.4.21 and is located in unstable

george@mozart:~> sudo apt-get build-dep kernel-image-2.4.21-1-generic
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Note, selecting kernel-tree-2.4.21 instead of kernel-tree-2.4.21-2
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  kernel-patch-debian-2.4.21 kernel-source-2.4.21 kernel-tree-2.4.21 


george@mozart:~> apt-cache policy kernel-tree-2.4.21  
kernel-tree-2.4.21:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 2.4.21-2
  Version Table:
     2.4.21-2 0
        500 ftp://ftp.uni-erlangen.de unstable/main Packages


Ionut

On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 03:25:48PM +0200, Lars Oeschey wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2003 15:53 schrieb Ionut Georgescu:
> 
> > apt-get build-dep kernel-image-2.4.21-1-generic
> 
> strange again... When I try that, I get 
> E: Build-Depends dependency on kernel-image-2.4.21-1-alpha cannot be 
> satisfied because the package kernel-tree-2.4.21-1 cannot be found
> 
> and a dpkg -l kernel* only reveals sources up to 2.4.20. Is my 
> sources.list bad?:
> 
> #stable
> deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
> deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
> 
> #testing
> deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free
> deb http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main
> 
> #source
> deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
> deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 

-- 
***************
* Ionut Georgescu
* http://www.physik.tu-cottbus.de/~george/
* Registered Linux User #244479
*
* "In Windows you can do everything Microsoft wants you to do; in Unix you
*                can do anything the computer is able to do."



Reply to: