[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: xp1000 problems with upgrade to 2.4.18-generic



Keith,
	Do a "modprobe -l" as root to see what modules are available, then
"modprobe <modulename>" to insert it. Then add that module name to the
file /etc/modules if you want it to get inserted on boot automatically.
	The stock video card that came with the XP1000 might be
unsupported - it depends. There were a couple of different cards that came
with that machine, depending on configuration. I had to replace mine. I
just put in a Matrox Millennium MGA and things work perfectly. To
re-setup the X server, do "dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86"
	-Josiah



On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Keith Grider wrote:

> Hello group,
>
> I was able to get woody running on my xp1000. It was pretty painless,
> actually. I have been used to RedHat and Suse on intel, so this is my
> first exposure to Debian and SRM/Alpha. The installation went pretty
> well except for X, more about that later. I used APT to upgrade to the
> 2.4.18-generic kernel and now the modules do not automagically load.
> This means I do not get the network anymore. I have plunked around and
> cannot seem to find this. I have done an 'insmod de4x5.o' and still
> cannot get it to initialize the card. Any ideas or hints to get it back
> on the lan.
>
> X. Now, I am confused. with 2.2.x, would boot, it would try to load XDM
> and fail (switching of screens, etc.) Then i got a blue screen asking if
> I wanted to configure X. It would actually then give me an X window and
> I was able to even get KDE running. Great. Now, when I tried to log out,
> it hung and when I tried to get back into X, it did the same thing. I
> think it has something to do with the config tool and I have not figured
> it out yet. I want xfree 4.x. Which configurator is the one for 4.x? Any
> other pointers welcome.
>
> KeithG
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>



Reply to: