Re: [PATCH] 2.5.42 osf partition raid autodetech

[Falk Hueffner <falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de>]

Tom Vier <tmv@comcast.net> writes:

> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 11:18:16AM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > Tom Vier <tmv@comcast.net> writes:
> > 
> > > here's the 2.5 version
> > 
> > BTW, it seems the partition numbering has changed in 2.5, now if you
> > have, say, partition a and d, you end up with hda1 and hda2, not hda1
> > and hda4 as in 2.4. Do you know whether that is intentional? Is there
> > any problem with non-continuous partition numbers in 2.5?
> 
> do you mean if you have only a, c (whole drive), and d partitions?
> i've never tried skipping a disklabel partition, so i'm not sure how
> they behave.

Yes, that's what I meant (or rather, I have no c/whole drive either,
since I don't use Tru64). I did that because I made a raid, and I
wanted the raided partition to be 'd' on every drive.

BTW, does raid0 work for you on Alpha with 2.5? I had problems last
time I tried.

-- 
	Falk