Re: Binary NMU needed for swisswatch

[Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>]

On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 04:03:43PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 02:02:18AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > swisswatch 0.6-7.1 was badly numbered on alpha:
> > 
> >   [cjwatson@auric ~]$ madison swisswatch
> >   swisswatch |      0.6-7 |        stable | source, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc
> >   swisswatch |    0.6-7.1 |        stable | alpha
> >   swisswatch |    0.6-7.1 |       testing | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
> >   swisswatch |    0.6-7.1 |      unstable | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sh, sparc
> > 
> > That is, 0.6-7.1 was just a recompile of 0.6-7 on alpha, but was
> > numbered like a source NMU, so the real source NMU that followed it has
> > never been built on alpha. Could someone please upload a binary NMU of
> > swisswatch numbered as 0.6-7.1.1?
> 
> Just done.

Normally speaking, binary NMUs don't include source in the upload; now
all the other architectures are having to rebuild.

Oh well, I suppose it does the job, indirectly ...

Thanks,

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]