Re: [PATCH] 2.5.42 osf partition raid autodetech
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 11:18:16AM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Tom Vier <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > here's the 2.5 version
> BTW, it seems the partition numbering has changed in 2.5, now if you
> have, say, partition a and d, you end up with hda1 and hda2, not hda1
> and hda4 as in 2.4. Do you know whether that is intentional? Is there
> any problem with non-continuous partition numbers in 2.5?
do you mean if you have only a, c (whole drive), and d partitions? i've
never tried skipping a disklabel partition, so i'm not sure how they behave.
Tom Vier <email@example.com>
DSA Key ID 0xE6CB97DA