Re: aptitude on alpha (again, sigh)
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 09:22:49AM -0500, Daniel Burrows <firstname.lastname@example.org> was heard to say:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 11:00:51PM +0100, Falk Hueffner <email@example.com> was heard to say:
> > > Can anyone reproduce/hunt down 114270? I can't reproduce it (I think
> > > it's probably Alpha specific), and I don't really have much of an
> > > idea where it could be. I haven't gotten any other reports of this,
> > > which makes me wonder if maybe it could be the reporter's system.
> > I can't reproduce this with version 0.2.7.1-1. Instead, it starts
> > eating all memory when hitting return on a package, of course because
> > of an unsigned int compared against string::npos (didn't we have this
> > before a few times?)
> I've gotten aptitude compiled on lully, and I can't reproduce this
> (with the most recent version) Do you still see it?
I'm an idiot, and I already applied a patch from you for it.
(the updating problem is still real, though)
/-------------------- Daniel Burrows <firstname.lastname@example.org> -------------------\
| If we do not change our direction |
| we are likely to end up where we are headed. |
\------- (if (not (understand-this)) (go-to http://www.schemers.org)) --------/