[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: aptitude on alpha (again, sigh)

On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 09:22:49AM -0500, Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org> was heard to say:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 11:00:51PM +0100, Falk Hueffner <falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de> was heard to say:
> > >   Can anyone reproduce/hunt down 114270?  I can't reproduce it (I think
> > > it's probably Alpha specific), and I don't really have much of an
> > > idea where it could be.  I haven't gotten any other reports of this,
> > > which makes me wonder if maybe it could be the reporter's system.
> > 
> > I can't reproduce this with version Instead, it starts
> > eating all memory when hitting return on a package, of course because
> > of an unsigned int compared against string::npos (didn't we have this
> > before a few times?)
>   I've gotten aptitude compiled on lully, and I can't reproduce this
>   (with the most recent version)  Do you still see it?

  I'm an idiot, and I already applied a patch from you for it.

  (the updating problem is still real, though)


/-------------------- Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org> -------------------\
|                If we do not change our direction                            |
|                we are likely to end up where we are headed.                 |
\------- (if (not (understand-this)) (go-to http://www.schemers.org)) --------/

Reply to: