Re: Binary NMU needed for swisswatch
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 04:03:43PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 02:02:18AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > swisswatch 0.6-7.1 was badly numbered on alpha:
> > [cjwatson@auric ~]$ madison swisswatch
> > swisswatch | 0.6-7 | stable | source, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc
> > swisswatch | 0.6-7.1 | stable | alpha
> > swisswatch | 0.6-7.1 | testing | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
> > swisswatch | 0.6-7.1 | unstable | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sh, sparc
> > That is, 0.6-7.1 was just a recompile of 0.6-7 on alpha, but was
> > numbered like a source NMU, so the real source NMU that followed it has
> > never been built on alpha. Could someone please upload a binary NMU of
> > swisswatch numbered as 0.6-7.1.1?
> Just done.
Normally speaking, binary NMUs don't include source in the upload; now
all the other architectures are having to rebuild.
Oh well, I suppose it does the job, indirectly ...
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]