Re: [PATCH] POSIX and SVr4 compliant SIGSEGV handling

To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: debian-alpha@lists.debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] POSIX and SVr4 compliant SIGSEGV handling
From: Goswin Brederlow <goswin.brederlow@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
Date: 01 Sep 2001 01:44:17 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87vgj3hk1a.fsf@dual.debian.lt.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 8766b3j4z5.fsf@dual.debian.lt.de>
References: <[🔎] 87lmk8e5zo.fsf_-_@dual.debian.lt.de> <[🔎] 8766b3j4z5.fsf@dual.debian.lt.de>

Hi,

theres a small bug in the patch, the " = = " must of cause be " = ",
doesn't compile otherwise. Not sure where that came from.

MfG
        Goswin

Reply to:

References:
- kernel, missing force_sig_info support for segfaults
  - From: Goswin Brederlow <goswin.brederlow@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
- [PATCH] POSIX and SVr4 compliant SIGSEGV handling
  - From: Goswin Brederlow <goswin.brederlow@student.uni-tuebingen.de>

Prev by Date: [PATCH] POSIX and SVr4 compliant SIGSEGV handling
Previous by thread: [PATCH] POSIX and SVr4 compliant SIGSEGV handling
Next by thread: Re: (alpha) YES, we have working boot-floppies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread