Re: next problem...
> I meant to say "packages" but wrote "binaries" instead :-P Teaches me to
> write email before I wake up fully.
;) Sounds familiar - usually I refuse to write anything that needs
precision before I have had at least one mug of coffee!
> No, it's a bit more complex than that. C++ code that uses multiple
> inheritence sometimes fails when compiled under 2.95.4 because there's no
> handle to hang destructors from (so they can't be called on
> exit...instead, the GP gets the value of main()'s exit function and calls
> that). Mozilla and KDE packages are also problematic for the same
> reasons.
Haven't got any problems with mozilla (sid's) but I do not have KDE
at all (since it exists in woody although there seems to be no
installation candidate for alpha - need to apt-get --build source
kdebase so it is still under way).
> It's all the compiler, not the source (usually).
I'll attack wdm with 3.0 first and see what comes out... Although I
do not see how _its_ problem could lie in compiler - more like some
library. I'll return to dx and the list of FPE-ing applications
tomorrow or on Monday. Until then...
--
-----------------------------------------------
| Juha Jäykkä, juolja@utu.fi |
| home: http://www.utu.fi/~juolja/ |
-----------------------------------------------
Reply to: