Re: Debian libtiff package and bug #106706
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 07:19:42PM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > __LP64__ is _supposed_ to be defined by mumble-standard compliant
> > compilers...
> Hehehehe...never knew that. I don't think it was ever defined on
> Alpha. I'll look back at older gcc sources to be sure, but it's not
> defined even in 3.0. Sure it's a standards thing?
Hum, seems I'm wrong.
This _really_ sucks. #ifdef __LP64__ was rather convenient.
#if defined(__LP64__) || defined (__alpha) || _MIPS_SZLONG==64 || ...
is _not_ convenient. In the kernel, we normally use BITS_PER_LONG == 64,
I don't suppose you userspace people have anything this useful, do you?
Revolutions do not require corporate support.