Re: Package builds for potato
On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, Bart Warmerdam wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 1999 at 03:12:47PM -0500, Christopher C Chimelis wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, Bart Warmerdam wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe we could also persuade Jason to upgrade albert and stay with the current
> > > stable release for faure. This way it's easy for developers to upload for
> > > stable as well as unstable. Since i have ony one machine...
> >
> > Sounds good. I'm working on getting a new Alpha for the project right now
> > (believe me, from what I can tell, it'll be nice if I can pull it off).
> > If I manage it, it'll be available for all and be running the latest
> > unstable. In that event, I'll leave my Noname up with 128M RAM (slow, but
> > workable) to build against stable.
> >
> Nice. I hope you *can* pull it off :)
>
> I will cc this msg to Jason (hoping he thinks the albert/faure thing is a
> good idea).
So what is it you want? Right now nobody uses albert (for good reason, it
has no disk space and there are no accounts :>) and faure is the 'fast'
alpha that people do use.. Do you want to leave albert on stable and
upgrade faure to unstable (that way people without alphas can still
upload their own packages)?
Jason
Reply to: