On Thu 03 Dec 1998, James Carlson wrote:
> I may have gotten this wrong, but:
> ld.so.1, ld.so, libc.so.6 don't exist-- I'd have thought that they'd be
> in the ldso_1.9.9-5.1.deb, but they don't seem to be. Am I missing
> something? Do I need to make symlinks to ld-2.0.7.so and libc.so.6.1 to
> make things work?
What are the symptoms that caused you to look for this problem?
As debian/alpha is libc6.1-based, there shouldn't be any libc.so.6,
neither should it be needed.
home: firstname.lastname@example.org | work: email@example.com | debian: firstname.lastname@example.org
http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software, Enschede, the Netherlands
- From: "James Carlson" <email@example.com>