Re: remove libpng0g / libpng0g-dev ?
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Paul Slootman wrote:
> libpng0g seems to have been replaced by libpng2 (even according to the
> description of libpng0g :-).
>
> Should I file a bug to have these removed? After all, why carry around
> unnecessary ballast? All that needs to be done is to rebuild povray and
> xpvmpov (both in non-free, so not that important anyway...). Nothing
> else depends on libpng0g.
Sounds good to me. I can't see the point of having them there either
(unless we're gonna run into another charlie-foxtrot like we did with GTK
and GNOME, that is...hehehe).
C
Reply to: