Hi James, Thank you for bringing this up on the list. I was involved in the discussions on OSAID design from the very beginning, and I personally strongly oppose the 1.0-rc1 version. Allowing "Open Source AI" to hide their training data is nothing but setting up a "data barrier" protecting the monopoly, disabling anybody other than the first party to reproduce or replicate an AI. Once passed, OSI is making a historical mistake towards the FOSS ecosystem. I had lots of comments in their forum regarding this [4]. Instead of "sign to endorse", I sign to strongly oppose it. On Sun, 2024-10-20 at 16:35 +0000, James Addison wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm not subscribed to this list, but felt that this might be relevant to you: > > The Open Source Initiative has recently announced[1] version 1.0rc1 of > their Open Source AI Definition, and are collecting community > endorsements[2] in addition to community feedback on hackmd[3] and > their forum[4]. > > The text of the rc1 definition can be found at: > https://opensource.org/deepdive/drafts/the-open-source-ai-definition-1-0-rc1 > > Regards, > James > > [1] - > https://opensource.org/blog/the-open-source-ai-definition-v-1-0-rc1-is-available-for-comments > > [2] - https://opensource.org/osaid-endorse > > [3] - https://hackmd.io/@opensourceinitiative/osaid-1-0-RC1 > > [4] - http://discuss.opensource.org/ >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part