Re: Is llvm-toolchain-17 something that could be backported?
- To: debian-ai@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Is llvm-toolchain-17 something that could be backported?
- From: Christian Kastner <ckk@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 10:40:37 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] e41860be-ddbd-4c74-ba32-55da6bf58c87@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <b84ahoN9IIRf_bHJatf8ECLV3UzfqWa4VzX5mcryBVOVV_awQGPFlKBrErMgzFN0nyO4S4R0tYy86KPFuUpb2OmbRvs3huYpN7evzb6QaCs=@ledru.info>
- References: <f10f24c1-77fc-478e-aa45-19912b847571@debian.org> <b84ahoN9IIRf_bHJatf8ECLV3UzfqWa4VzX5mcryBVOVV_awQGPFlKBrErMgzFN0nyO4S4R0tYy86KPFuUpb2OmbRvs3huYpN7evzb6QaCs=@ledru.info>
Just an update for the list: while backporting would usually be quite
straightforward, There are two changes between the releases that make
this somewhat more difficult: the 64-bit time_t transition, and the move
to /usr/bin.
I did not look into this yet, and will probably not have the time to do
in the very near future.
Best,
Christian
On 2024-06-13 17:14, sylvestredeb@ledru.info wrote:
> It should not be too hard as they are already built for bookworm for apt.llvm.org
>
> Dont hesitate to give it a try
Reply to: