rocm-opencl-icd
- To: Cordell Bloor <cgmb@slerp.xyz>
- Cc: debian-ai@lists.debian.org
- Subject: rocm-opencl-icd
- From: Kari Pahula <kaol@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 17:37:22 +0300
- Message-id: <[🔎] ZoK_IuORqcxgzb9J@sammakko4.piperka.net>
- In-reply-to: <E2C05B56-4A47-4126-A3DF-200CC31B3D9E@slerp.xyz>
- References: <ZnvToejZmN7PDFo6@sammakko4.piperka.net> <38cab200-c09a-4df5-ac54-1345b4485ba6@debian.org> <4448D107-F5D9-4105-8783-FFC4F320592A@slerp.xyz> <E2C05B56-4A47-4126-A3DF-200CC31B3D9E@slerp.xyz>
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 11:11:30PM +0200, Cordell Bloor wrote:
> Thanks for migrating hipify and rocdbgapi.
Add rocfft and hipfft to the pile. hipfft has a new package for the
tests and needs to go through NEW.
> I just recalled that the ROCm OpenCL functionality would be very
> easy to enable. The library and utilities successfully build when
> the rocm-hipamd switch is enabled [1]. We just need to define binary
> packages for the resulting artifacts.
I'm having a look, though unfortunately it wasn't quite as simple as
that. Just enabling the build flag and populating the rocm-opencl-icd
package makes clinfo fail with
: CommandLine Error: Option 'sanitizer-early-opt-ep' registered more than once!
LLVM ERROR: inconsistency in registered CommandLine options
Aborted
Meaning that LLVM gets called twice, or something. I'll try to figure
this one out.
> [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/rocm-team/rocm-hipamd/-/blob/debian/5.7.1-3/debian/rules?ref_type=tags#L33
Reply to: