Étienne Mollier, on 2022-07-03: > M. Zhou, on 2022-06-30: > > Cool. I quickly went through the packaging scripts, and updated > > the ROCm dependency tree: > > https://salsa.debian.org/rocm-team/community/team-project > > > > I have to admit it is really easy to forget the whole dependency > > tree if not touching the sources for a while. So it is nice to > > have a documentation. > > I concur, this is very convenient to check the status of > packages, and see what change is likely to affect which package. > I pulled updates to ROCm 5.2.0 for the level 1, trying to make > sure I was not throwing too much entropy to the entire graph. > Things seem to look good for the moment. Level 2 / rocm-device-libs may have to wait a bit though, because otherwise I end up with missing symbols in a rocm-hipamd 5.0.0 build attempt: lld: error: undefined symbol: __oclc_ABI_version >>> referenced by /tmp/hipTextureMipmapObj2D-cae27e/hipTextureMipmapObj2D-gfx803.o:(tex2DKernel(float*, __hip_texture*, int, int, float)) >>> referenced by /tmp/hipTextureMipmapObj2D-cae27e/hipTextureMipmapObj2D-gfx803.o:(tex2DKernel(float*, __hip_texture*, int, int, float)) clang: error: amdgcn-link command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) I have not tried to bump rocm-hipamd version yet, but I suppose transitionning the remaining packages to ROCm 5.2.0 would solve the issue. I guess it would be preferable to keep rocm-hipamd 5.0.0 ftbfs free while it is still in the New queue? Kind Regards, -- Étienne Mollier <emollier@emlwks999.eu> Fingerprint: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da Sent from /dev/pts/2, please excuse my verbosity.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature